|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{Singularitytext|'''Best known for'''}}}}
| | https://sneed.sytes.net:97/ |
| [[File:Bestknownfor.png|thumb|{{quote|>{{Singularitytext|best known for}}}}]]
| |
| {{Gem|content=This page is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being a '''{{gemtext|gem}}'''.}}
| |
| | |
| '''{{Singularitytext|best known for}}''' is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being a spineless weasel phrase {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being the sole anonymous authority that [[Wikipedia]] [[Janny|jannies]] are {{Singularitytext|best known for}} allowing in their site. It is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being a vague and ambiguous crutch for bad articles.
| |
| | |
| At the time of writing, there are approximately 142k Wikipedia pages<ref>Using a search engine to search for site:wikipedia.org {{Singularitytext|”best known for”}}</ref> and over 2k pages on this very wiki that are {{Singularitytext|best known for}} using this cowardly phrase.
| |
| | |
| == {{Singularitytext|best known for}} conflicting with rules ==
| |
| Putting {{Singularitytext|”best known for”}} in an article is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being against Wikipedia's own rules as per a [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view|NPOV]] and [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions|AWW]]. This is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} becoming comically self-evident when [[you]] read the example list of terms that are {{Singularitytext|best known for}} conflicting with AWW:
| |
| | |
| * '''''some people say'''''
| |
| * '''''it is believed'''''
| |
| * '''''many are of the opinion'''''
| |
| * '''''most feel'''''
| |
| * '''''it is often reported'''''
| |
| * '''''it is widely thought'''''
| |
| * '''''it is often said'''''
| |
| * '''''<var>X</var> has been described as <var>Y</var>'''''
| |
| | |
| But apparently {{Singularitytext|”best known for”}} is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being A-OK [[Weeaboo|daijoubu]]...
| |
| | |
| == {{Singularitytext|best known for}} IP ==
| |
| {{Gigachad|content=Why yes, the person behind the {{Singularitytext|best known for}} IP is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being a gigachad.|content2=How were you {{Singularitytext|best known for}} telling?}}
| |
| ''Wikipedia's article (warning: {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being extremely biased): [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP|{{Singularitytext|best known for}} IP]]''
| |
| A prominent name in Wikipedia's [[Long-term abuse|list of so-called long-term abuse]] is a hero {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being disparagingly called "{{Singularitytext|best known for}} IP" (BKFIP). This [[Britain|British]] [[gigachad]] is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} removing "{{Singularitytext|best known for}}" in articles for ten years going.<ref name=":0">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP</ref> And unlike other names in their "abuse" list, {{redglow|BKF}}IP isn't {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being a troll. In fact, this is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being openly stated by the Wikipedia Ministry of Love as the biggest obstacle in its unjust conspiracy to remove him from history:<blockquote>The principal problem with this case is that most edits made by this user are >{{Singularitytext|best known for}} being good-faith edits that are often supported by editors when looked at on their individual merits. This makes issues of conduct {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being harder to enforce.<ref name=":0" /></blockquote>Wikipedia jannies are {{Singularitytext|best known for}} claiming to have given him 3-month IP bans for the crime of removing instances of "{{Singularitytext|best known for}}" in articles.<ref name=":0" /> Why? According to them, his edit summaries are {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being [[The Coffin of Andy and Leyley|"snarky".]] As you read through the article, it is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} becoming obvious that the only reason they are persecuting this innocent man and refusing to concede that he is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being right is {{Singularitytext|best known for}} being due to him being {{Singularitytext|best known for}} his "incivility" and "offensive and aggressive summaries" and "personal attacks in the edit summaries."<ref name=":0" /> Yikesballs.
| |
| | |
| Comparisons have been made by [[Qa/ (4chan)|/qa/]] users<ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4317834/#4319630</ref><ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4418526</ref><ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4321171/#4321171</ref> between this user and the [[Selfish Little Fuck|Anti-Thougher's]] war on [[Thougher|thoughers]].
| |
| | |
| == {{Singularitytext|best known for}} seeing also ==
| |
| *[[Long-term abuse]]
| |
| *[[Though]]
| |
| {{reflist}}
| |
| {{Dialect}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Pages that are best known for looking like the thing they're about]]
| |
| [[Category:Spineless weasel words]]
| |
